Features · Subjective
Structured opinions, kept private.
Evaluation tools that make staff judgment consistent, attributed, and clearly separate from objective grades.
Subjective features.
Opinions are valuable — when they are structured, attributed, and kept separate from the facts.
Staff evaluation forms
Scouting templates for each sport so every evaluator answers the same questions.
- Sport-specific templates
- Live and video modes
- Required vs optional fields
Character, coachability, leadership
Structured 1–5 ratings with written evidence, separate from performance grades.
- Rating plus evidence
- Rubric anchors
- Visible only to staff
Reference requests
Send standard questions to coaches and teachers and keep the answers with the athlete.
- Reusable question sets
- Response tracking
- Private to your program
Coach Fit and Team Need questionnaires
Define what your coach and roster want once, then score every athlete against it.
- Coach Fit questionnaire
- Team Need by position and class
- Adjustable weights
Multi-evaluator scores
Average several evaluators and surface the spread, so one voice never silently decides.
- Per-evaluator scores
- Disagreement flagged
- Discussion prompts
Private notes and tags
Quick notes and tags that stay inside your program.
- Private by default
- Shared tags
- Searchable
Bias guardrails
Prompts that keep evaluations about observed behavior and evidence.
- Evidence-required prompts
- Flags for loaded language
- Blind-first review option
Status: shown with fictional data in the product preview. Bias guardrails help staff reflect; they do not replace human judgment or institutional policy.